Why we laugh of rite ? Because it is laughable! Praise of laughter

Charlie (link) persists

 A mole in the Vatican. The pope:  "it changes me of the choirboys".

Mohamed upsets by integrists : "it is hard to be loved by assholes"

 

 Faithful injured by unfaithfull. Unfaithful injured by faithful.

Images from "blog of a free man" (lien)

________________

In a secular state, religion is not law. And the state does not provide to one religion or another any pre-eminence over all other ideologies. Under the freedom of conscience, the believer as the unbeliever have freedom of expression, it follows that no believer in any religion can  a pretend to a "right" to be shocked by subjective expression of an opinion contrary to his ethical in order to claim the ban of it. The sacred, blasphemy is specific to the axiology of his obedience and no universal. [The only rights are universal human rights.] Admit that a believer may prescribe or direct others to obey the axioms of his religion is to give it undue intellectual superiority over any other one and philosophical or political ideology, and, with an unbearable morgue, notify the other of the inferiority of their intellectual state. Atheism has a right to equal respect and consideration even when the believer would find it abhorrent. An atheist for example can think about the meaning of Eucharist it is a ritual cannibalistic practice, offense to the logical reason. However none of them has the right to go to violence against Christians. Christian or Muslim believer should react similarly to the practice of their ideological competitors. All. "Charlie" has the right to caricature, to mock any prophet or religion without having to collect "auctoritas" from anyone, and Cristians and Muslims have in return the right with equality of arms for criticism, even vehement. What is sacred is only freedom of expression for all indiscriminately, with equal rights. 
From Pierre Doyen (lien)

We could say better than Victor Hugo: "Christian Hell = fire. Islamic hell = fire. Hell Hindu = fire. Would that mens that according all religions, God is born roaster? Moncef Founou (link)

_________________________

".. In fact, even if the images of "Charlie" personally do not make me laugh every time, they are to be congratulated for not having yielded as it was suggested by some left politicians after the protests and threats of integrists, and on this point, we can say they have saved the honor and freedom of ALL. Because telling someone "you can think or write ALL, EXCEPT.. [what I decide].." is exactly the same thing as telling "you can think or write NOTHING, EXCEPT.. [what I decided], so you cannot express without my auctoritas", whatever is placed after "EXCEPT".
As the reader of the Qur'an urges "have you read it?" to one commentator who speaks of a "warrior text", I answer for him : yes, I read it, as the Bible and as the Vedhas.. and yes, it is a warrior text -like Bible and so on... - even if otherwise there is also written "Allah is great and forgive." A contradictory text, as a "Spanish inn", like most religious one, but here with additions, the hadiths (link) that are often worse and sometimes wrongfully pretend to be the text itself" HL (link)